Rewriting peace and conflict
The Virtual Encyclopaedia represents a compilation of theory and empirical research in peace and conflict studies from de- and postcolonial approaches, emphasising the contributions from the research network ‘Postcolonial hierarchies in Peace and Conflict Studies.’
Click Here
Podcast: Confronting Hierarchies
In the six episodes of the podcast, we question dominant narratives in dialogue with a diversity of voices within and beyond academia and critically engage with theories and research practices. Join us in our journey of confronting hierarchies.
Click Here
Video: Plural Perspectives on Peace and Conflict in Asia.
In this video four scholars provide diverse theoretical insights from which we can approach peace and conflict in Asia today. What all of them share is an analysis of how histories of colonialism and imperialism shape both the present of nation-states and individual experiences.
Click Here

Rewriting peace and conflict

While peace and conflict studies (PACS) is a burgeoning and diverse field, it still grapples with its colonial roots and trajectory. Postcolonial and decolonial approaches have pointed out that research and practice in PACS are based on West-driven epistemological and ontological grounds resulting from colonial structures of power that hinder and often misconstrue our understanding of peace, conflict, and violence and contribute to the reproduction of the structures sustaining different forms of violence. Dominant dynamics of knowledge production in the field have marginalized non-Western and indigenous epistemologies and worldviews. For a critical engagement that contests the effects of colonialism and coloniality of knowledge, scholars have emphasised the need to interrogate and problematise foundational concepts in the different disciplines of Social Sciences. Such endeavour also entails unsettling the patterns of (in)visibility by bringing the voices and different forms of knowledge of traditionally marginalised groups to the centre.

Against this background, the Virtual Encyclopaedia offers an interdisciplinary compilation of crucial theoretical and conceptual debates, empirical analyses, and thorough reflection on methods and knowledge production in the field from de- and postcolonial approaches, with an emphasis on the contributions from the collaborative network Postcolonial Hierarchies in Peace and Conflict. Rather than unambiguous and all-encompassing definitions, the Virtual Encyclopaedia aims to provide readers with the tools to critically approach peace and conflict studies through the lenses of postcolonial theory and decolonial thought.

 

Taking seriously the critique of the coloniality of knowledge and its effects on the field, the Virtual Encyclopedia aims to address epistemic hierarchies and inequalities by promoting the inclusion of multiple and diverse voices (in terms of fields, regions, and career stages) and plural perspectives, as well as fostering cooperative networks.

Virtual Encyclopaedia

Entries

Classified into the two clusters ‘Theoretical and conceptual debates’ and ‘Methods, Knowledge production and dissemination’, the entries aim to provide an insight and orientation on key concepts and theories as well as empirical analyses which are important for a post-/decolonial perspective on peace and conflict. Each entry has a number of tags through which it is linked with other entries sharing those tags. The entries are  furthermore interconnected and draw from a diverse body of knowledges in dialogue including different formats such as audio, images or storytelling.

P

Postcolonial and decolonial differences

Amid academic fondness for embracing trends and ‘turns’, it is reasonable to ask about the actual difference between post- and decolonial perspectives and to consider whether this difference warrants our attention. This lemma seeks to provide some answers, engaging critically with key arguments by decolonial scholars on how their work differs from postcolonial perspectives. I argue that we should pay attention to the key debates sparked by the ‘decolonial turn’ while avoiding the use of buzzwords and strawman arguments. Additionally, I demonstrate the synergies and frictions between post-/decolonial writings within peace and conflict studies, focusing specifically on the deconstruction and reconstruction of human rights.

Read More »
D

Decolonial Solidarity

This entry sheds light on the concept and practice of decolonial solidarity. Drawn from Indigenous theory, settler colonial theory and critical race theory, decolonial solidarity interrogates the involvement of dominant, privileged actors who attempt to act ‘in solidarity’ with oppressed, colonised and marginalised groups. This entry first outlines the contradictions and problems that emerge from solidarity across power asymmetries. It then shows that through a process of decolonising solidarity, both in the actions of activists and through a political and ethical commitment to challenge structures of domination, it may be possible to engage in effective solidarity.

Read More »
Y

Youth perspectives on peace

Drawing on conversations with Brazilian high school and undergraduate students, this entry explores how young people understand peace, violence and power in their everyday lives. While peace is often imagined as tranquillity or an inner state, students also highlight the importance of respect, recognition and dignity in social relationships. Their reflections reveal violence as a multidimensional phenomenon rooted in inequality, racism and gender discrimination. At the same time, many perceive power primarily as domination, raising important questions about youth empowerment and the possibilities for collective social change that may foster peace.

Read More »

Participating
institutions

Skip to content