Rewriting peace and conflict
The Virtual Encyclopaedia represents a compilation of theory and empirical research in peace and conflict studies from de- and postcolonial approaches, emphasising the contributions from the research network ‘Postcolonial hierarchies in Peace and Conflict Studies.’
Click Here
Podcast: Confronting Hierarchies
In the six episodes of the podcast, we question dominant narratives in dialogue with a diversity of voices within and beyond academia and critically engage with theories and research practices. Join us in our journey of confronting hierarchies.
Click Here
Video: Peace and Conflict in Latin America.
In this video we invite a group of renowned scholars to discuss the colonial legacies and continuities and their connection to dynamics of peace and violence in the region. We conclude with a brief overview of post and de-colonial debates in Latin America.
Click Here

Rewriting peace and conflict

While peace and conflict studies (PACS) is a burgeoning and diverse field, it still grapples with its colonial roots and trajectory. Postcolonial and decolonial approaches have pointed out that research and practice in PACS are based on West-driven epistemological and ontological grounds resulting from colonial structures of power that hinder and often misconstrue our understanding of peace, conflict, and violence and contribute to the reproduction of the structures sustaining different forms of violence. Dominant dynamics of knowledge production in the field have marginalized non-Western and indigenous epistemologies and worldviews. For a critical engagement that contests the effects of colonialism and coloniality of knowledge, scholars have emphasised the need to interrogate and problematise foundational concepts in the different disciplines of Social Sciences. Such endeavour also entails unsettling the patterns of (in)visibility by bringing the voices and different forms of knowledge of traditionally marginalised groups to the centre.

Against this background, the Virtual Encyclopaedia offers an interdisciplinary compilation of crucial theoretical and conceptual debates, empirical analyses, and thorough reflection on methods and knowledge production in the field from de- and postcolonial approaches, with an emphasis on the contributions from the collaborative network Postcolonial Hierarchies in Peace and Conflict. Rather than unambiguous and all-encompassing definitions, the Virtual Encyclopaedia aims to provide readers with the tools to critically approach peace and conflict studies through the lenses of postcolonial theory and decolonial thought.

 

Taking seriously the critique of the coloniality of knowledge and its effects on the field, the Virtual Encyclopedia aims to address epistemic hierarchies and inequalities by promoting the inclusion of multiple and diverse voices (in terms of fields, regions, and career stages) and plural perspectives, as well as fostering cooperative networks.

Virtual Encyclopaedia

Entries

Classified into the two clusters ‘Theoretical and conceptual debates’ and ‘Methods, Knowledge production and dissemination’, the entries aim to provide an insight and orientation on key concepts and theories as well as empirical analyses which are important for a post-/decolonial perspective on peace and conflict. Each entry has a number of tags through which it is linked with other entries sharing those tags. The entries are  furthermore interconnected and draw from a diverse body of knowledges in dialogue including different formats such as audio, images or storytelling.

E

Policy Paper: Energy, Imperialism and Global Hierarchies in Dispute

This text links two events – the United States’ military intervention in Venezuela and their explicit threats regarding Greenland – as expressions of a single historical pattern: normative selectivity and international impunity, which enable a world power such as the United States to project their imperial military force in order to effect political change in other sovereign states when strategic risks are at stake, particularly in relation to energy resources and critical minerals.

From a Latin American perspective, these dynamics are hardly new. The vocabulary of imperialism, dependency and coloniality has constituted, for decades, an analytical and political repertoire through which to name processes frequently softened in institutional language as measures of stabilisation or security, undertaken in the name of “democracy.”

My argument is that the so-called liberal, rules-based order is not collapsing as a result of a recent deviation, but is instead revealing – once again and with renewed starkness – its long-standing foundations: the entanglement of imperial and colonial violence, economic expansionism and the control of energy sources that have sustained and reconfigured global hierarchies of power over several centuries.

Read More »
S

Shuar visions of peace

Deconstructing the coloniality of peace through the eyes of the Indigenous Shuar community unveils the power relations often inherent in theories of peace and spaces for peace. Western-centric definitions allow states to determine who can experience peace and who cannot—narrowly defining it through the absence of violence holds up a curtain over other more invisible or ‘slow violence’ that occurs over time, through systematic oppression and degradations to all forms of life (both human and the more-than-human).

Read More »
D

Digna Rabia

Digna rabia matters because it captures an unruly, collectively cultivated anger forged amid the forms of devastation produced by capitalism, driving communities to resist destruction and craft alternative horizons.

Read More »

Participating
institutions

Skip to content