Illustrated Report: Movilización, Resistencias y Memoria Popular

Mobilisation, Resistances, and Popular Memory

Disponible en español: Movilización, Resistencias y Memoria Popular

Latin America, protests, resistance, social movements

 

Sobre esta publicación:

En marzo de 2024, movimientos sociales y activistas de las ciudades de Santiago de Chile y Santiago de Cali (Colombia) e investigadores del Arnold Bergstraesser Institut (ABI) de Friburgo se reunieron virtualmente para un intercambio de saberes y experiencias tomando como referencia las protestas masivas que tuvieron lugar en cada ciudad. Esta iniciativa tuvo como premisa central el reconocimiento que las comunidades y los movimientos sociales son parte activa de las dinámicas de  producción de espacio y gobernanza de la ciudad, así como productores y portadores de diferentes formas de conocimiento. La reunión de movimientos sociales e iniciativas populares de Colombia y Chile estuvo motivada por el objetivo de crear conexiones reflexivas como lazos personales y colectivos entre los actores y experiencias de cada ciudad. Este documento recopila algunas de las principales reflexiones del intercambio.

Viviana García Pinzón and Fabricio Rodríguez are senior researchers at the Arnold Bergstraesser Institute (ABI) and members of the network “Postcolonial Hierarchies in Peace & Conflict”. In the framework of the network, their research addresses conflict and peace in urban contexts. Inspired by decolonial debates, their aim is to understand and confront epistemic hierarchies in academia by drawing on the political practice that takes shape and dynamism in the streets of Latin America.  

The artistic illustrations of this policy paper were developed by Iván Garzón Mayorga in collaboration with Paula Rodríguez.

This policy paper gathers reflections that emerged in dialogue with social movements and activists in Chile and Colombia. From Chile: Corporación Umbrales, Movimiento Rangiñtulewfü and Movimiento por el Agua y los Territorios MAT. From Colombia: Juntanza Popular por la Transformación Social, Radiofónicas and Tribunal Popular de Siloé.

 

This contribution is part of the research project ‘Postcolonial Hierarchies in Peace & Conflict’ [grant number 01UG2205D], funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Se permite el uso público de las ilustraciones con la condición de acreditar al ilustrador © Iván Garzón Mayorga.

Public use of the illustrations is permitted with attribution to the illustrator © Iván Garzón Mayorga.

 

Classic Approaches to Security

Traditionally, only states were actors of security in security research. This meant that states were seen as the ones who act and who were capable of performing security in the international arena, at least in the eyes of International Relations canon and particularly in terms of military security (Morgenthau, 1954; Waltz, 2001, 2010). However, after the end of the Cold War and the subsequent widening of the security agenda, new research laid more emphasis on the social construction of security (Katzenstein, 1996), and since the development of these new approaches to security the field has made substantial progress in understanding, conceptualising and utilising empirical and conceptual insights in the dynamics of producing, ordering and maintaining security within and beyond the state’s framework. These further developments range from security communities (Adler & Barnett, 1996, 2008) to the various constructions, controversies and (re-)negotiation of security and order in public-private relations (Abrahamsen & Williams, 2009, 2010) and hybrid security governance (Schröder, Chappuis, & Kocak, 2014).

How to cite this entry:

Ketzmerick-Calandrino 2024: “Security. Speaking with Fanon?”. Virtual Encyclopaedia – Rewriting Peace and Conflict. 08.10.2024. https://rewritingpeaceandconflict.net/security-speaking-with-fanon/.

Skip to content