Transformative Justice

Transformative Justice, Transitional Justice, Peacebuilding Activism, Reparations, Development

 

For a decade, transformative justice has become a lens to critique traditional transitional justice approaches, one than emphasises bottom-up approaches, socio-economic rights and social mobilisation instead of purely legalistic approaches. In this entry we discuss some of the limitations the transformative justice agenda still faces, and we discuss some entry points to start addressing these challenges: developments on the issue of reparations, the Colombian experience, and reinvigorating the role of social mobilisation in aiming at transformative goals. 

Transformative Justice
„In our territory, we seed peace. Peasant Reserve Zone” (ZRC) in Pradera, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. The ZRC is an bottom-up initatinve that aims to overcome the agrarian roots of armed violence in Colombia.
© José A. Gutiérrez, 2017.

Paul Gready is Director of the Centre for Applied Human Rights, University of York (UK), co-editor of the Journal of Human Rights Practice, and holds a UNESCO Chair focusing on the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Expansion of Political Space.

Learn More

José A. Gutiérrez is a sociologist with an anthropological background, and lecturer at the Centre for Applied Human Rights and the Department of Politics at the University of York. His work, focused particularly in rural settings, explores the intersections between conflict studies, human rights and peace studies.

Learn More

Upcoming

 

Classic Approaches to Security

Traditionally, only states were actors of security in security research. This meant that states were seen as the ones who act and who were capable of performing security in the international arena, at least in the eyes of International Relations canon and particularly in terms of military security (Morgenthau, 1954; Waltz, 2001, 2010). However, after the end of the Cold War and the subsequent widening of the security agenda, new research laid more emphasis on the social construction of security (Katzenstein, 1996), and since the development of these new approaches to security the field has made substantial progress in understanding, conceptualising and utilising empirical and conceptual insights in the dynamics of producing, ordering and maintaining security within and beyond the state’s framework. These further developments range from security communities (Adler & Barnett, 1996, 2008) to the various constructions, controversies and (re-)negotiation of security and order in public-private relations (Abrahamsen & Williams, 2009, 2010) and hybrid security governance (Schröder, Chappuis, & Kocak, 2014).

How to cite this entry:

Ketzmerick-Calandrino 2024: “Security. Speaking with Fanon?”. Virtual Encyclopaedia – Rewriting Peace and Conflict. 08.10.2024. https://rewritingpeaceandconflict.net/security-speaking-with-fanon/.

Skip to content