Sumak Kawsay

decolonial, nonviolence, resistance, sumak kawsay

 

Nonviolent actions that promote new rights, question dominant discourses and practices of progress and development, challenge the coloniality of power, knowledge and being. These resistances, especially in defence of the rights of nature and communities, are not adequately integrated in studies of civil resistance. This text explores how good living or Sumak Kawsay in Ecuador contributes to nonviolent resistance, identifying points of encounter, divergence and complementarity between the two concepts and approaches to their practical orientation. It highlights the decolonial approach of Sumak Kawsay in the reclaiming of being, knowledge and power, and points out that its incorporation into studies of nonviolent resistance could generate a more inclusive and sensitive approach to the struggles of indigenous peoples.

abya yala flag
Wiphala - flag of the native people of the Andes

María Belén Garrido recieved her PhD at the Department of History and Social Science, Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (KU). María does research in Civil Resistance, Peacebuilding, Conflict Studies, Human Rights and International Relations. Their current project is ‘Civil Resistance Process in Ecuador: 1997-2005.

 

Learn More

Paola Lozada is an associate professor at the Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador (PUCE).

 

Learn More

Upcoming

 

Classic Approaches to Security

Traditionally, only states were actors of security in security research. This meant that states were seen as the ones who act and who were capable of performing security in the international arena, at least in the eyes of International Relations canon and particularly in terms of military security (Morgenthau, 1954; Waltz, 2001, 2010). However, after the end of the Cold War and the subsequent widening of the security agenda, new research laid more emphasis on the social construction of security (Katzenstein, 1996), and since the development of these new approaches to security the field has made substantial progress in understanding, conceptualising and utilising empirical and conceptual insights in the dynamics of producing, ordering and maintaining security within and beyond the state’s framework. These further developments range from security communities (Adler & Barnett, 1996, 2008) to the various constructions, controversies and (re-)negotiation of security and order in public-private relations (Abrahamsen & Williams, 2009, 2010) and hybrid security governance (Schröder, Chappuis, & Kocak, 2014).

How to cite this entry:

Ketzmerick-Calandrino 2024: “Security. Speaking with Fanon?”. Virtual Encyclopaedia – Rewriting Peace and Conflict. 08.10.2024. https://rewritingpeaceandconflict.net/security-speaking-with-fanon/.

cover podcast postcol horizontal

Podcast

Layla Brown and Filiberto Penados in conversation with Fabricio Rodríguez and Viviana García Pinzón

Skip to content